From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" Subject: Re: [PATCH][PACKET] Remove unneeded packet_socks_nr variable Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:53:01 -0200 Message-ID: <20071107155301.GJ27345@ghostprotocols.net> References: <4731DAA3.7060306@openvz.org> <20071107155004.GI27345@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Pavel Emelyanov , David Miller , Linux Netdev List , devel@openvz.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:40389 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754026AbXKGPxH (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 10:53:07 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071107155004.GI27345@ghostprotocols.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:50:04PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > Em Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 06:32:51PM +0300, Pavel Emelyanov escreveu: > > This one is used only under ifdef PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG in > > printk and is not needed otherwise. So hide all this stuff > > under the PACKET_REFCNT_DEBUG. > > > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov > > Look at sk_refcnt_debug_inc, etc and you'll se a more standard way. I > forgot to make this when making all protocol families use sk_prot, even > if just partially :-) As a bonus you'll get this information on /proc/net/protocols, removing '-1' from PACKET column for "sockets". - Arnaldo