From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ben Hutchings Subject: Re: [PATCH] ethtool: add support for supporting 10000baseT Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 18:25:53 +0000 Message-ID: <20071107182552.GC3320@solarflare.com> References: <20071107162420.5102.26358.stgit@localhost.localdomain> <20071107165749.GB3320@solarflare.com> <4731FEC0.4020803@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "Kok, Auke" Return-path: Received: from pythagoras.zen.co.uk ([212.23.3.140]:41242 "EHLO pythagoras.zen.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751209AbXKGSZ6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 13:25:58 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4731FEC0.4020803@intel.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Kok, Auke wrote: > Ben Hutchings wrote: > > Auke Kok wrote: > >> From: Jesse Brandeburg > >> > >> there is missing support in ethtool for reporting 10000baseT > >> as SUPPORTED_10000baseT_Full. The code seems to be half > >> implemented because the "advertising" field has the implementation. > > > > I reported this lack on Sourceforge a while back: > > > > Is anyone reading bugs reported there? > > not really. However with plenty of new 10gig hardware going through > here we're currently looking at ethtool support and seeing if it > misses anything. I think that's the only remaining issue we have with ethtool itself. There's a wider issue of clause 45 MDIO for 10G Ethernet though. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.