Re: [RFC] dependencies for platform drivers (was Re: ax88796: add superh to kconfig dependencies)

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 08:18:54 +0000 Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 04:31:05PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> >  config AX88796
> >  	tristate "ASIX AX88796 NE2000 clone support"
> > -	depends on ARM || MIPS
> > +	depends on ARM || MIPS || SUPERH
> 
> You know, that really sucks more and more.  How about doing the following:
> 	a) making it depend on PLAT_HAS_AX88796
> 	b) adding selects for all subarchitectures that have the corresponding
> platform device
> and setting that as a uniform policy for platform drivers?

Yup, but we should be religious about the naming conventions.  ARCH_HAS_
and PLAT_HAS_ followed by the exact name of the thus-enabled config option.

>  For things like
> SM501 we would do
> config MFD_SM501
> 	depends on PCI || PLAT_HAS_SM501
> etc.

See, bug.  That should be PLAT_HAS_MFD_SM501

> Seriously, folks, we are getting shitloads of platform drivers with no
> dependencies whatsoever, needed on a handful of targets and occasionally
> failing to build on unrelated architectures.  Moreover, having a list
> of architectures in dependencies for each of those suckers is a PITA
> from the conflict POV.  Not to mention platform drivers that fall into
> the mainline kernel with not a single platform device for them, etc.
> 
> Comments?

grep PPC drivers/*/Kconfig and weep.