From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2]: e1000: avoid lockup durig error recovery Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 08:55:19 -0800 Message-ID: <20071110085519.0b430069@shemminger-laptop> References: <20071107211935.GH4239@austin.ibm.com> <47323FFE.2060008@intel.com> <20071107232119.GQ4239@austin.ibm.com> <200711091802.36365.netdev@axxeo.de> <20071109224005.GQ4239@austin.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Kok, Auke" , Jeff Garzik , e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, NetDev , "Brandeburg, Jesse" , Ingo Oeser , john.ronciak@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, wenxiong@us.ibm.com To: linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071109224005.GQ4239@austin.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: e1000-devel-bounces@lists.sourceforge.net List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 9 Nov 2007 16:40:05 -0600 linas@austin.ibm.com (Linas Vepstas) wrote: > On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 06:02:34PM +0100, Ingo Oeser wrote: > > Linas Vepstas schrieb: > > > + * napi_enabled_p - return non-zero if napi enabled > > > + * > > > + * Mnemonic: _p stands for "predicate", returning a yes/no > > > + * answer to the question. > > > > Call it "is_napi_enabled()" an nobody will ask :-) > > Heh. The suffix _p is standard coding style for lisp/scheme > and first-order logic interpreters. This was my lame attempt > to introduce it to the kernel. I guess that lame duck won't fly. > > --linas > NO. it reeks of hungarian notation. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/