netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kaber@trash.net, joonwpark81@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu,
	cfriesen@nortel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:16:47 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071113121647.GA1330@gondor.apana.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071113.040624.43544149.davem@davemloft.net>

On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:06:24AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> > In other words we can make it so that nobody is in promiscuous
> > mode and therefore have to disable VLAN acceleration *unless*
> > they really want to be in that state.  In which case it would
> > imply that they wish to see everything and therefore we should
> > disable VLAN acceleration.
> 
> This is too complicated, we have multiple unicast MAC support
> in the driver API already, let's simply use it.

Yes I agree.  People not using Patrick's new API deserves to
get poor performance so they can switch over sooner :)

What I was trying to say above is that e1000 currently uses
the old set_multicast_list interface (rather than dev_set_rx_mode)
so it's not immediately obvious why we're in promiscuous mode.
We could look at dev->promiscuity - !!uc_count but that feels a
bit fragile.

Perhaps those who want to push this patch should be encouraged
to convert e1000 to the new interface :)

Cheers,
-- 
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt

  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-13 12:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-11  0:51 [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode Joonwoo Park
2007-11-12 17:12 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-12 17:21   ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-12 18:01     ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-12 22:33     ` David Miller
2007-11-12 22:43       ` Chris Friesen
2007-11-12 22:54         ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-14 11:48           ` Benny Amorsen
2007-11-12 22:57         ` David Miller
2007-11-12 23:15           ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-12 23:19             ` David Miller
2007-11-12 23:32               ` Willy Tarreau
2007-11-12 23:38                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-12 23:40                 ` David Miller
2007-11-13  1:21                   ` Joonwoo Park
2007-11-13 10:21                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-13 11:09                       ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-13 11:36                         ` David Miller
2007-11-13 12:03                           ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-13 12:06                             ` David Miller
2007-11-13 12:16                               ` Herbert Xu [this message]
2007-11-13 12:18                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-13 16:41                                   ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-13 17:26                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-13 17:30                                       ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-14  9:42                                         ` Patrick McHardy
2007-11-14 23:30                                           ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-13 19:59                                       ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-13 12:32                                 ` David Miller
2007-11-13  1:21             ` Joonwoo Park
2007-11-12 22:28   ` David Miller
2007-11-13 20:43 ` Stephen Hemminger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-11-14  4:47 Joonwoo Park
2007-11-14  5:12 ` Kok, Auke
2007-11-14  6:15   ` Joonwoo Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071113121647.GA1330@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --to=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=cfriesen@nortel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=joonwpark81@gmail.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).