From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 00:30:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20071119.003017.223165152.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20071118214515.GA8161@one.firstfloor.org> <20071118.144010.236028466.davem@davemloft.net> <4740EE9B.40901@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk To: wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:37449 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751336AbXKSIaS (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:30:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4740EE9B.40901@cn.fujitsu.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Wang Chen Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 10:02:03 +0800 > So if "udp_queue_rcv_skb() doing sucessfully" means "a UDP > datagrams delivered to UDP users", the InDatagrams should be > increased in udp_queue_rcv_skb(). > Otherwise it should be increased until the UDP datagrams is > actually delivered to UDP users. I agree.