netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: billfink@mindspring.com
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, the.sator@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 23:49:43 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119.234943.214163033.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071120001607.916f4537.billfink@mindspring.com>

From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 00:16:07 -0500

> On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Alexey Kuznetsov wrote:
> 
> > 2. What's about your suggestion, I thought about this and I am going to agree.
> > 
> >    Arguments, which convinced me are:
> > 
> >    - arping still works.
> >    - any piece of reasonable software should work.
> >    - if Windows understands DaD (is it really true? I cannot believe)
> >      and it is unhappy about our responce and does not block use
> >      of duplicate address only due to this, we _must_ accomodate ASAP.
> >    - if we do,we have to use 0 protocol address, no choice.
> 
> I agree the target protocol address should be 0 in this case.

Patches, someone :-)

      reply	other threads:[~2007-11-20  7:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-15 11:40 [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 (was: Strange behavior in arp probe reply, bug or feature?) Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-15 15:40 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-11-15 21:40   ` Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-15 23:28     ` [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 David Miller
2007-11-16  8:30       ` Jonas Danielsson
2007-11-16  9:05         ` David Miller
2007-11-16 14:13           ` Benny Amorsen
2007-11-16 19:26           ` Bill Fink
2007-11-17 22:14             ` Jarek Poplawski
2007-11-19 13:06     ` [PATCH] net/ipv4/arp.c: Fix arp reply when sender ip 0 (was: Strange behavior in arp probe reply, bug or feature?) Alexey Kuznetsov
2007-11-20  5:16       ` Bill Fink
2007-11-20  7:49         ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071119.234943.214163033.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=billfink@mindspring.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=the.sator@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).