From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com,
herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:29:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071119152933.GA19126@one.firstfloor.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071118.144010.236028466.davem@davemloft.net>
> > >
> > > All of our options suck, we just have to choose the least sucking one
> > > and right now to me that's decrementing the counter as much as I
> > > empathize with the SNMP application overflow detection issue.
> >
> > If the SNMP monitor detects an false overflow the error it reports
> > will be much worse than a single missing packet. So you would replace
> > one error with a worse error.
>
> This can be fixed, the above cannot.
I don't see how, short of breaking the interface
(e.g. reporting 64bit or separate overflow counts)
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-19 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-16 2:46 [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter Wang Chen
2007-11-16 2:54 ` David Miller
2007-11-16 3:18 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-16 4:04 ` David Miller
2007-11-16 4:13 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-16 17:02 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-11-16 4:11 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-16 4:17 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-17 13:18 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-18 0:09 ` David Miller
2007-11-18 21:45 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-18 22:40 ` David Miller
2007-11-19 1:09 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-19 8:26 ` David Miller
2007-11-19 2:02 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-19 8:30 ` David Miller
2007-11-19 4:41 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-19 8:32 ` David Miller
2007-11-19 11:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2007-11-19 15:29 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-11-19 22:23 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 5:29 ` Bill Fink
2007-11-20 6:15 ` David Miller
2007-11-20 6:25 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-20 6:31 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-20 14:05 ` Andi Kleen
2007-11-21 1:39 ` David Miller
2007-11-29 7:55 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-29 9:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-29 10:08 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-29 10:21 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-29 10:33 ` Wang Chen
2007-11-29 10:38 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-29 10:56 ` Gerrit Renker
2007-11-29 12:01 ` Herbert Xu
2007-11-18 22:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071119152933.GA19126@one.firstfloor.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).