From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Evgeniy Polyakov Subject: Re: [PATCH] LRO ack aggregation Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 16:35:09 +0300 Message-ID: <20071120133509.GA17377@2ka.mipt.ru> References: <20071119.222214.81458569.davem@davemloft.net> <4742C96D.3050203@myri.com> <20071120.035558.214794900.davem@davemloft.net> <4742E0A9.2070205@myri.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Miller , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org, ossthema@de.ibm.com To: Andrew Gallatin Return-path: Received: from relay.2ka.mipt.ru ([194.85.82.65]:37163 "EHLO 2ka.mipt.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751530AbXKTNfq (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:35:46 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4742E0A9.2070205@myri.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi. On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 08:27:05AM -0500, Andrew Gallatin (gallatin@myri.com) wrote: > Hmm.. rather than a global tunable, what if it was a > network driver managed tunable which toggled a flag in the > lro_mgr features? Would that be better? What about ethtool control to set LRO_simple and LRO_ACK_aggregation? -- Evgeniy Polyakov