From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Denys Fedoryshchenko" <denys@visp.net.lb>
Subject: Re: HTB/HSFC shaping precision
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:31:17 +0200
Message-ID: <20071121103024.M12218@visp.net.lb>
References: <20071120211258.M55249@visp.net.lb> <20071121094710.GA2295@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=koi8-r
Cc: hadi@cyberus.ca, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from usermail.globalproof.net ([194.146.153.18]:50537 "EHLO
	usermail.globalproof.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752791AbXKUKbc (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 21 Nov 2007 05:31:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20071121094710.GA2295@ff.dom.local>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:47:10 +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote
> 
> But, if you have full control on your side, it looks like a kind of
> realtime traffic, and then HFSC should be more appropriate for this
> (but I only 'heard' about this).

One message later, thats what i dreamed about :-)
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] NET_SCHED: PSPacer qdisc module 
On website they have very good explanation... 
http://www.gridmpi.org/gridtcp.jsp

--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.