From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: Does tc-prio really work as advertised? Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:12:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20071127141251.GA4291@ff.dom.local> References: <759014.71791.qm@web51409.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Joerg Pommnitz Return-path: Received: from mx10.go2.pl ([193.17.41.74]:57780 "EHLO poczta.o2.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756429AbXK0OIQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 09:08:16 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <759014.71791.qm@web51409.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:00:55AM -0800, Joerg Pommnitz wrote: ... > The OLSR traffic was obviously generated locally (not forwarded). > You claim, that the TOS value for locally generated traffic does > not influence its priority? I wouldn't say "I claim": I've found something like this 'long time ago' (enough to forget), and didn't need this information since then. Now, I see you have 'nearby' problem, so it's only a hint. After your first message I think you should be able to check this by yourself. But, if there are any problems with this, you find my idea wrong or not valid anymore, I'm interested in knowing about this. Cheers, Jarek P.