From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 18:31:27 +0100 Message-ID: <200711281831.27379.ak@suse.de> References: <20071122343.446909000@suse.de> <20071127230645.GB31491@one.firstfloor.org> <20071128164817.GK3406@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Jon Masters , Rusty Russell , Roland Dreier , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org To: Adrian Bunk Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071128164817.GK3406@stusta.de> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wednesday 28 November 2007 17:48:17 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:06:45AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:00:22PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > >... > > > of a modular ipv6 is flawed. > > > > Modules that cannot be unloaded are still useful. Standard case: Distributions > > like to offer an option to not use ipv6 because that is popular workaround > > for the common "DNS server eats AAAA queries and causes delays" issue. > > Forcing the user to rebuild the kernel for this wouldn't be practical. > > If ipv6 wasn't modular that would be hard to do. > > It should be trivial doing it similar to the selinux=0 boot option. They safe also a few hundred KB of memory this way. I know it is not en vogue anymore to care about memory bloat, but I personally like that. -Andi