From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro. Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:18:33 +1100 Message-ID: <200711301318.34379.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20071122343.446909000@suse.de> <20071126102533.1c774870@freepuppy.rosehill.pdx.hemminger.net> <20071129085334.5793a922@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Stephen Hemminger , Roland Dreier , Andi Kleen , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sam@ravnborg.org To: Arjan van de Ven Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:52919 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758190AbXK3CSh (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:18:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20071129085334.5793a922@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday 30 November 2007 03:53:34 Arjan van de Ven wrote: > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:25:33 -0800 > > > Agreed. On first glance, I was intrigued but: > > > > 1) Why is everyone so concerned that export symbol space is large? > > - does it cost cpu or running memory? > > yes. about 120 bytes per symbol But this patch makes that worse, not better. > > - does it cause bugs? > > yes, bad apis are causing bugs... sys_open is just the starter of that. Sure, but this doesn't change the APIs, either. We seem to have fixed sys_open the right way, and since we're not supposed to care about out-of-tree modules... Rusty.