From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, ego@in.ibm.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.osdl.org, devel@openvz.org,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org, xemul@openvz.org,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 16:37:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071201003721.GA22726@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
Hello!
The rcu_assign_pointer() primitive currently unconditionally executes
a memory barrier, even when a NULL pointer is being assigned. This
has lead some to avoid using rcu_assign_pointer() for NULL pointers,
which loses the self-documenting advantages of rcu_assign_pointer()
This patch uses __builtin_const_p() to omit needless memory barriers
for NULL-pointer assignments at compile time with no runtime penalty,
as discussed in the following thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg54852.html
Tested on x86_64 and ppc64, also compiled the four cases (NULL/non-NULL
and const/non-const) with gcc version 4.1.2, and hand-checked the
assembly output.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
rcupdate.h | 11 +++++++----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff -urpNa -X dontdiff linux-2.6.24-rc1-ego/include/linux/rcupdate.h linux-2.6.24-rc1-egoxu/include/linux/rcupdate.h
--- linux-2.6.24-rc1-ego/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2007-11-06 15:30:02.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6.24-rc1-egoxu/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2007-11-30 09:06:11.000000000 -0800
@@ -191,10 +191,13 @@ static inline void rcu_preempt_boost(voi
* code.
*/
-#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) ({ \
- smp_wmb(); \
- (p) = (v); \
- })
+#define rcu_assign_pointer(p, v) \
+ ({ \
+ if (!__builtin_constant_p(v) || \
+ ((v) != NULL)) \
+ smp_wmb(); \
+ (p) = (v); \
+ })
/**
* synchronize_sched - block until all CPUs have exited any non-preemptive
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-01 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-01 0:37 Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2007-12-01 1:07 ` [PATCH] Remove rcu_assign_pointer() penalty for NULL pointers Herbert Xu
2007-12-01 6:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071201003721.GA22726@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bridge@lists.osdl.org \
--cc=devel@openvz.org \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=ego@in.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).