From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: SSB: No is not an answer Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:45:32 -0500 Message-ID: <20071201174532.GA3809@tuxdriver.com> References: <20071201171744.GJ30008@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Michael Buesch , netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from ra.tuxdriver.com ([70.61.120.52]:4190 "EHLO ra.tuxdriver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752248AbXLARqU (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 12:46:20 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071201171744.GJ30008@ghostprotocols.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > You only need to enable this option, if you are > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > this bus. > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > environments. > > The module will be called ssb. > > If unsure, say N. > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com