From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: SSB: No is not an answer Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 17:00:23 -0200 Message-ID: <20071201190023.GK30008@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20071201171744.GJ30008@ghostprotocols.net> <20071201174532.GA3809@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Michael Buesch , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: "John W. Linville" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:46873 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752722AbXLATBY (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Dec 2007 14:01:24 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071201174532.GA3809@tuxdriver.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:45:32PM -0500, John W. Linville escreveu: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > > You only need to enable this option, if you are > > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > > this bus. > > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > > environments. > > > > The module will be called ssb. > > > > If unsure, say N. > > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) > > I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say > no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? > > So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. Ok, so the comment on being unsure is wrong as we can't say N as suggested :-) - Arnaldo