* SSB: No is not an answer @ 2007-12-01 17:17 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-01 17:45 ` John W. Linville 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-01 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Buesch; +Cc: netdev Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. You only need to enable this option, if you are configuring a kernel for an embedded system with this bus. It will be auto-selected if needed in other environments. The module will be called ssb. If unsure, say N. Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SSB: No is not an answer 2007-12-01 17:17 SSB: No is not an answer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-01 17:45 ` John W. Linville 2007-12-01 19:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: John W. Linville @ 2007-12-01 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Michael Buesch, netdev On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > You only need to enable this option, if you are > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > this bus. > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > environments. > > The module will be called ssb. > > If unsure, say N. > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. John -- John W. Linville linville@tuxdriver.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SSB: No is not an answer 2007-12-01 17:45 ` John W. Linville @ 2007-12-01 19:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-01 20:27 ` Michael Buesch 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-01 19:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John W. Linville; +Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Michael Buesch, netdev Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:45:32PM -0500, John W. Linville escreveu: > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > > You only need to enable this option, if you are > > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > > this bus. > > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > > environments. > > > > The module will be called ssb. > > > > If unsure, say N. > > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) > > I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say > no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? > > So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. Ok, so the comment on being unsure is wrong as we can't say N as suggested :-) - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SSB: No is not an answer 2007-12-01 19:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-01 20:27 ` Michael Buesch 2007-12-02 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-03 8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Michael Buesch @ 2007-12-01 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; +Cc: John W. Linville, netdev On Saturday 01 December 2007 20:00:23 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:45:32PM -0500, John W. Linville escreveu: > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > > > > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > > > You only need to enable this option, if you are > > > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > > > this bus. > > > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > > > environments. > > > > > > The module will be called ssb. > > > > > > If unsure, say N. > > > > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) > > > > I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say > > no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? > > > > So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. > > Ok, so the comment on being unsure is wrong as we can't say N as > suggested :-) Oh, come on... Read the _whole_ comment. -- Greetings Michael. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SSB: No is not an answer 2007-12-01 20:27 ` Michael Buesch @ 2007-12-02 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-03 8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-02 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Buesch; +Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, John W. Linville, netdev Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 09:27:49PM +0100, Michael Buesch escreveu: > On Saturday 01 December 2007 20:00:23 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:45:32PM -0500, John W. Linville escreveu: > > > On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n > > > > > > > > Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. > > > > You only need to enable this option, if you are > > > > configuring a kernel for an embedded system with > > > > this bus. > > > > It will be auto-selected if needed in other > > > > environments. > > > > > > > > The module will be called ssb. > > > > > > > > If unsure, say N. > > > > > > > > Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) > > > > > > I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say > > > no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? > > > > > > So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. > > > > Ok, so the comment on being unsure is wrong as we can't say N as > > suggested :-) > > Oh, come on... Read the _whole_ comment. Oh well, if you think that it is OK, so be it, I found it confusing and reported, you find it ok to suggest chosing 'N' when 'M' or 'y' are the only possible answers. Perhaps telling that N is not a possible answer when B44 or B43 was previously selected could help, up to you. - Arnaldo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: SSB: No is not an answer 2007-12-01 20:27 ` Michael Buesch 2007-12-02 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2007-12-03 8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jarek Poplawski @ 2007-12-03 8:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Michael Buesch; +Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, John W. Linville, netdev On 01-12-2007 21:27, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Saturday 01 December 2007 20:00:23 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >> Em Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:45:32PM -0500, John W. Linville escreveu: >>> On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 03:17:44PM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >>>> Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) n >>>> >>>> Support for the Sonics Silicon Backplane bus. >>>> You only need to enable this option, if you are >>>> configuring a kernel for an embedded system with >>>> this bus. >>>> It will be auto-selected if needed in other >>>> environments. >>>> >>>> The module will be called ssb. >>>> >>>> If unsure, say N. >>>> >>>> Sonics Silicon Backplane support (SSB) [M/y/?] (NEW) >>> I think this is OK -- it isn't really offering the choice to say >>> no anyway. You must have turned-on B44 or B43(LEGACY) already? >>> >>> So, your choice is merely whether to have it built-in or as a module. >> Ok, so the comment on being unsure is wrong as we can't say N as >> suggested :-) > > Oh, come on... Read the _whole_ comment. Why? IMHO "If unsure..." are kind of defaults just to let you not read or understand "the whole comment". But here even reading the whole doesn't make this less amusing, because it suggests you still have the choice (eg. to revert auto-selection). Regards, Jarek P. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-12-03 8:52 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2007-12-01 17:17 SSB: No is not an answer Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-01 17:45 ` John W. Linville 2007-12-01 19:00 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-01 20:27 ` Michael Buesch 2007-12-02 12:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 2007-12-03 8:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).