From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: sockets affected by IPsec always block (2.6.23)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 03:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20071206.033909.76192198.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <200712061156.48810.stefan@loplof.de>
	<20071206.031302.201608796.davem@davemloft.net>
	<200712061235.06025.stefan@loplof.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, simon@fire.lp0.eu,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: stefan@loplof.de
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48977
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752047AbXLFLjN (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 6 Dec 2007 06:39:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200712061235.06025.stefan@loplof.de>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Stefan Rompf <stefan@loplof.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 12:35:05 +0100

> Because you just will put enough RAM modules into you server when
> setting up a scalable system.

This suggestion is avoiding the important semantic issue, and
won't lead to a real discussion of the core problem.