From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: stefan@loplof.de
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, simon@fire.lp0.eu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: sockets affected by IPsec always block (2.6.23)
Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 05:55:15 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071206.055515.180308628.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200712061330.20586.stefan@loplof.de>
From: Stefan Rompf <stefan@loplof.de>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 13:30:20 +0100
> IMHO this is what developers expect, and is also consistent with the
> fact that POSIX does not define O_NONBLOCK behaviour for local
> files.
You keep ignoring the fact that, as Herbert and I discussed, not
blocking for IPSEC resolution will make some connect() cases fail that
would otherwise not fail.
There are two sides to this issue, and we need to consider them
both.
Long term a resolution-packet-queue provides a solution that handles
both angles correctly, but we don't have that code yet.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-06 13:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-04 18:53 sockets affected by IPsec always block (2.6.23) Simon Arlott
2007-12-05 0:12 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-05 6:30 ` David Miller
2007-12-05 6:51 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-05 7:12 ` David Miller
2007-12-05 7:16 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-05 7:34 ` David Miller
2007-12-05 7:39 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-05 9:55 ` David Miller
2007-12-05 9:57 ` Herbert Xu
2007-12-05 18:42 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-05 18:39 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-06 2:25 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 8:49 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-06 8:53 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 10:56 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-06 11:13 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 11:35 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-06 11:39 ` David Miller
2007-12-06 12:30 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-06 13:55 ` David Miller [this message]
2007-12-06 14:31 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-07 3:20 ` David Miller
2007-12-07 9:29 ` Stefan Rompf
2007-12-16 22:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-12-16 23:22 ` David Miller
2007-12-05 6:06 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071206.055515.180308628.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simon@fire.lp0.eu \
--cc=stefan@loplof.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).