From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] : tehuti Fix possible causing oops of net_rx_action Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 21:39:39 -0800 Message-ID: <20071211213939.122de1db@freepuppy.rosehill> References: <002901c83c73$b089b6e0$9c94fea9@jason> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: , , , , To: "Joonwoo Park" Return-path: Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:51265 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753515AbXLLFlr (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Dec 2007 00:41:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <002901c83c73$b089b6e0$9c94fea9@jason> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 13:01:27 +0900 "Joonwoo Park" wrote: > [NETDEV]: tehuti Fix possible causing oops of net_rx_action > > Signed-off-by: Joonwoo Park > --- > drivers/net/tehuti.c | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/tehuti.c b/drivers/net/tehuti.c > index 21230c9..955e749 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/tehuti.c > +++ b/drivers/net/tehuti.c > @@ -305,6 +305,8 @@ static int bdx_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget) > > netif_rx_complete(dev, napi); > bdx_enable_interrupts(priv); > + if (unlikely(work_done == napi->weight)) > + return work_done - 1; > } > return work_done; > } A better fix would be not going over budget in the first place. -- Stephen Hemminger