From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: delay via-rhine irq initialisation.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:39:09 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com> (raw)
With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ set, via-rhine complains during init.
(See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377721 for a report).
Does this diff look right?
(I don't have a via-rhine handy to test with)
We may be able to get away with moving the request_irq to just after the
alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
stand more chance of doing the right thing.
Comments?
Dave
Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
diff --git a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
index 07263cd..37b3efb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
+++ b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
@@ -1151,24 +1151,28 @@ static int rhine_open(struct net_device *dev)
void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
int rc;
- rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
- dev);
- if (rc)
- return rc;
-
if (debug > 1)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: rhine_open() irq %d.\n",
dev->name, rp->pdev->irq);
rc = alloc_ring(dev);
- if (rc) {
- free_irq(rp->pdev->irq, dev);
+ if (rc)
return rc;
- }
+
alloc_rbufs(dev);
alloc_tbufs(dev);
rhine_chip_reset(dev);
init_registers(dev);
+
+ rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
+ dev);
+ if (rc) {
+ free_rbufs(dev);
+ free_tbufs(dev);
+ free_ring(dev);
+ return rc;
+ }
+
if (debug > 2)
printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Done rhine_open(), status %4.4x "
"MII status: %4.4x.\n",
--
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
next reply other threads:[~2007-12-11 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-11 23:39 Dave Jones [this message]
2007-12-23 3:36 ` delay via-rhine irq initialisation Jeff Garzik
2008-01-02 23:34 ` Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com \
--to=davej@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).