netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: delay via-rhine irq initialisation.
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 18:39:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com> (raw)

With CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ set, via-rhine complains during init.
(See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=377721 for a report).

Does this diff look right?
(I don't have a via-rhine handy to test with)

We may be able to get away with moving the request_irq to just after the
alloc_tbufs(), but I feel if a real interrupt occured, this diff would
stand more chance of doing the right thing.

Comments?

	Dave

Delay irq registration until after we've allocated ring buffers,
otherwise DEBUG_SHIRQ will complain.

Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>

diff --git a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
index 07263cd..37b3efb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
+++ b/drivers/net/via-rhine.c
@@ -1151,24 +1151,28 @@ static int rhine_open(struct net_device *dev)
 	void __iomem *ioaddr = rp->base;
 	int rc;
 
-	rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
-			dev);
-	if (rc)
-		return rc;
-
 	if (debug > 1)
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: rhine_open() irq %d.\n",
 		       dev->name, rp->pdev->irq);
 
 	rc = alloc_ring(dev);
-	if (rc) {
-		free_irq(rp->pdev->irq, dev);
+	if (rc)
 		return rc;
-	}
+
 	alloc_rbufs(dev);
 	alloc_tbufs(dev);
 	rhine_chip_reset(dev);
 	init_registers(dev);
+
+	rc = request_irq(rp->pdev->irq, &rhine_interrupt, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name,
+			dev);
+	if (rc) {
+		free_rbufs(dev);
+		free_tbufs(dev);
+		free_ring(dev);
+		return rc;
+	}
+
 	if (debug > 2)
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: Done rhine_open(), status %4.4x "
 		       "MII status: %4.4x.\n",
-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk

             reply	other threads:[~2007-12-11 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-11 23:39 Dave Jones [this message]
2007-12-23  3:36 ` delay via-rhine irq initialisation Jeff Garzik
2008-01-02 23:34   ` Chuck Ebbert

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071211233909.GA22470@redhat.com \
    --to=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).