From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-2.6.25 1/3] Uninline the __inet_hash function Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 00:30:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20071220.003027.20529103.davem@davemloft.net> References: <47694231.2070406@cosmosbay.com> <47694F96.6030604@openvz.org> <476951A8.4040200@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: xemul@openvz.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, devel@openvz.org To: dada1@cosmosbay.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:48655 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750933AbXLTIac convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Dec 2007 03:30:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <476951A8.4040200@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:15:20 +0100 > Pavel Emelyanov a =E9crit : > > That's not truth, if I get you right. The __inet_hash() is called > > with 0, from all the places except for the inet_hash() one. >=20 > OK, but on cases with 0, sk->sk_state is !=3D TCP_LISTEN, unless I am= mistaken. This is true.