From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com, latten@austin.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] XFRM: RFC4303 compliant auditing
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:27:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712210827.24063.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071221.014310.155404661.davem@davemloft.net>
On Friday 21 December 2007 4:43:10 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:42:25 -0500
>
> > This patch adds a number of new IPsec audit events to meet the auditing
> > requirements of RFC4303. This includes audit hooks for the following
> > events:
> >
> > * Could not find a valid SA [sections 2.1, 3.4.2]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_notfound()
> > . xfrm_audit_state_notfound_simple()
> >
> > * Sequence number overflow [section 3.3.3]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_replay_overflow()
> >
> > * Replayed packet [section 3.4.3]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_replay()
> >
> > * Integrity check failure [sections 3.4.4.1, 3.4.4.2]
> > . xfrm_audit_state_icvfail()
> >
> > While RFC4304 deals only with ESP most of the changes in this patch apply
> > to IPsec in general, i.e. both AH and ESP. The one case, integrity check
> > failure, where ESP specific code had to be modified the same was done to
> > the AH code for the sake of consistency.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
>
> This doesn't apply at all to net-2.6.25, in particular
> xfrm6_input_addr() doesn't even have a local variable
> named "xfrm_vec_one" let alone the conditional where you're
> adding the state notfound audit hook.
>
> Please respin this and the third patch, thanks.
Sorry about that, I must have missed something (or probably just updated the
wrong tree on accident). I'll respin the patches and send them out today.
--
paul moore
linux security @ hp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-21 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-20 21:42 [PATCH 0/3] XFRM audit fixes/additions for net-2.6.25 Paul Moore
2007-12-20 21:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] XFRM: Assorted IPsec fixups Paul Moore
2007-12-20 22:25 ` James Morris
2007-12-21 4:49 ` David Miller
2007-12-20 21:42 ` [PATCH 2/3] XFRM: RFC4303 compliant auditing Paul Moore
2007-12-20 22:27 ` James Morris
2007-12-21 9:43 ` David Miller
2007-12-21 13:27 ` Paul Moore [this message]
2007-12-21 13:51 ` Paul Moore
2007-12-21 14:02 ` David Miller
2007-12-21 14:22 ` Paul Moore
2007-12-20 21:42 ` [PATCH 3/3] XFRM: Drop packets when replay counter would overflow Paul Moore
2007-12-20 22:28 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712210827.24063.paul.moore@hp.com \
--to=paul.moore@hp.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=latten@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).