From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul Moore Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] XFRM: RFC4303 compliant auditing Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:22:23 -0500 Message-ID: <200712210922.23386.paul.moore@hp.com> References: <20071221.014310.155404661.davem@davemloft.net> <200712210851.22521.paul.moore@hp.com> <20071221.060241.19624191.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-audit@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20071221.060241.19624191.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: linux-audit-bounces@redhat.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Friday 21 December 2007 9:02:41 am David Miller wrote: > From: Paul Moore > Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:51:22 -0500 > > > Ah, looks like I may not be crazy after all! It looks like the XFRM > > patches from Masahide NAKAMURA were pulled into net-2.6.25 just before > > mine last night which caused my patches to conflict ... > > Sorry. I had double checked and was going to rework your patches > by hand if that was the case, but for some reason I didn't see > his patches as being the culprit causing the rejects when I > checked things out. > > I must have looked over the history correctly. No harm, no foul. I've just about finished respining the patches, expect them shortly ... -- paul moore linux security @ hp