From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: A question about hh_cache Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2007 16:36:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20071230153626.GA32752@one.firstfloor.org> References: <147a89290712300531m4a8845betd23ef71f6d944799@mail.gmail.com> <147a89290712300712p5c586f57wff1b29e9fa807dee@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andi Kleen , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Andy Johnson Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:39633 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751588AbXL3Per (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:34:47 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <147a89290712300712p5c586f57wff1b29e9fa807dee@mail.gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:12:05PM +0200, Andy Johnson wrote: > Can there be a case in such environment (using IPv4 only) where > hh_cache of a neighbour instance is a > list with more than one entry ? In theory if some device supplies own multiple dst_ops with different protocol numbers. From a quick grep doesn't happen in tree. -Andi