From: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
To: "Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@googlemail.com>
Cc: "Alan Cox" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Adrian Bunk" <bunk@kernel.org>, "Bodo Eggert" <7eggert@gmx.de>,
"Jan Engelhardt" <jengelh@computergmbh.de>,
devzero@web.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2007 20:05:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712312005.17384.mb@bu3sch.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <64bb37e0712311037w42bae43ayb3c10b2e0310586d@mail.gmail.com>
On Monday 31 December 2007 19:37:43 Torsten Kaiser wrote:
> The base problem is that there already are many options to break
> external modules. (CONFIG_MODULES=n ;) )
Exactly. There already are enough ways to break external modules.
No need to introduce more. ;)
> The question I can't answer in this context is: Do distributions want
> to support external modules?
> Only if yes, your argument is valid. But then they could just disable
> this feature and prevent this kind of bugreports.
That's my point. Nobody will risk bugs to save a few bytes of memory.
--
Greetings Michael.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-31 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-12-31 12:09 [PATCH] Force UNIX domain sockets to be built in Bodo Eggert
2007-12-31 12:20 ` David Miller
2007-12-31 14:03 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-12-31 19:38 ` Al Viro
2008-01-01 3:45 ` Bodo Eggert
2008-01-01 3:48 ` David Miller
2008-01-01 4:48 ` Bodo Eggert
2008-01-01 5:01 ` Theodore Tso
2008-01-02 10:25 ` Herbert Xu
2008-01-02 12:26 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-12-31 12:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-31 13:26 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-12-31 14:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-31 15:19 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-12-31 15:34 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-31 17:43 ` Patrick Mau
2007-12-31 22:20 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-12-31 17:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-31 18:05 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-12-31 15:55 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-12-31 15:59 ` Michael Buesch
2007-12-31 16:01 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-31 16:17 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-12-31 16:38 ` Alan Cox
2007-12-31 17:18 ` Michael Buesch
2007-12-31 18:37 ` Torsten Kaiser
2007-12-31 19:05 ` Michael Buesch [this message]
2007-12-31 16:11 ` Torsten Kaiser
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-12-31 13:23 devzero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712312005.17384.mb@bu3sch.de \
--to=mb@bu3sch.de \
--cc=7eggert@gmx.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=devzero@web.de \
--cc=jengelh@computergmbh.de \
--cc=just.for.lkml@googlemail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).