netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] LSM: Add inet_sys_snd_skb() LSM hook
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 09:38:27 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200801040938.27515.paul.moore@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080103.204549.204229388.davem@davemloft.net>

On Thursday 03 January 2008 11:45:49 pm David Miller wrote:
> From: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
> Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:25:39 -0500
>
> > Add an inet_sys_snd_skb() LSM hook to allow the LSM to provide
> > packet level access control for all outbound packets.  Using the
> > existing postroute_last netfilter hook turns out to be problematic
> > as it is can be invoked multiple times for a single packet, e.g.
> > individual IPsec transforms, adding unwanted overhead and
> > complicating the security policy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul.moore@hp.com>
>
> I disagree with this change.
>
> The packet is different each time you see it in the postrouting hook,
> and also the new hook is thus redundant.

Well, thanks for taking a look.

> If it's a performance issue and you can classify the security early,
> mark the SKB as "seen" and then on subsequent hooks you can just
> return immediately if that flag is set.

Unfortunately, it's not quite that easy at present.  The only field we 
have in the skb where we could possibly set a flag is the secmark field 
which is already taken.  Granted, there is the possibility of 
segmenting the secmark field to some degree but that brings about a new 
set of problems involving the number of unique labels, backwards 
compatibility, etc.

Regardless, back to the drawing board.  I'll have to think a bit harder 
about a way to make the netfilter hooks work ...

-- 
paul moore
linux security @ hp

  reply	other threads:[~2008-01-04 14:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-03 17:25 [PATCH 0/2] Labeled networking core stack changes for 2.6.25 Paul Moore
2008-01-03 17:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] LSM: Add inet_sys_snd_skb() LSM hook Paul Moore
2008-01-04  4:45   ` David Miller
2008-01-04 14:38     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2008-01-04 21:09       ` David Miller
2008-01-04 22:37         ` Paul Moore
2008-01-03 17:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] NET: Clone the sk_buff 'iif' field in __skb_clone() Paul Moore
2008-01-03 18:33   ` Joe Perches
2008-01-03 18:40     ` Paul Moore

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200801040938.27515.paul.moore@hp.com \
    --to=paul.moore@hp.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).