From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: make ipv6_sysctl_register to return a value
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20080109.002632.136758957.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <47828DEB.9070301@fr.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: dlezcano@fr.ibm.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:43831
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750737AbYAII0d (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 03:26:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <47828DEB.9070301@fr.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>


Why did you post this again?  It's identical to patch 1/9
from the previous series you sent out.

This is confusing, since it makes me think you wanted me to
perhaps do something different or update an already
submitted patch.