From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =?iso-2022-jp?B?GyRCNUhGIzFRTEAbKEI=?= Subject: Re: Linux IPv6 DAD not full conform to RFC 4862 ? Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:40:51 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <20080110.014051.121940744.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> References: <20080109153656.GA16962@pingi.kke.suse.de> <20080110.013857.37616214.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org To: kkeil@suse.de Return-path: Received: from yue.linux-ipv6.org ([203.178.140.15]:34735 "EHLO yue.st-paulia.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752347AbYAIQks (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:40:48 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080110.013857.37616214.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: In article <20080110.013857.37616214.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> (at Thu, 10 Jan 2008 01:38:57 +0900 (JST)), YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明 says: > - we could have "dad_reaction" interface variable and > > 1: disable interface > = 1: disable IPv6 > < 0: ignore (as we do now) Argh, >0, 0 and <0, maybe. --yoshfuji