From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>
To: Breno Leitao <leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: e1000 performance issue in 4 simultaneous links
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 16:36:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080110163626.GJ3544@solarflare.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1199981839.8931.35.camel@cafe>
Breno Leitao wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've perceived that there is a performance issue when running netperf
> against 4 e1000 links connected end-to-end to another machine with 4
> e1000 interfaces.
>
> I have 2 4-port interfaces on my machine, but the test is just
> considering 2 port for each interfaces card.
>
> When I run netperf in just one interface, I get 940.95 * 10^6 bits/sec
> of transfer rate. If I run 4 netperf against 4 different interfaces, I
> get around 720 * 10^6 bits/sec.
<snip>
I take it that's the average for individual interfaces, not the
aggregate? RX processing for multi-gigabits per second can be quite
expensive. This can be mitigated by interrupt moderation and NAPI
polling, jumbo frames (MTU >1500) and/or Large Receive Offload (LRO).
I don't think e1000 hardware does LRO, but the driver could presumably
be changed use Linux's software LRO.
Even with these optimisations, if all RX processing is done on a
single CPU this can become a bottleneck. Does the test system have
multiple CPUs? Are IRQs for the multiple NICs balanced across
multiple CPUs?
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Senior Software Engineer, Solarflare Communications
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-10 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-10 16:17 e1000 performance issue in 4 simultaneous links Breno Leitao
2008-01-10 16:36 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2008-01-10 16:51 ` Jeba Anandhan
2008-01-10 17:31 ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-10 18:18 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-10 18:37 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-10 18:26 ` Rick Jones
2008-01-10 20:52 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-01-11 1:28 ` David Miller
2008-01-11 11:09 ` Benny Amorsen
2008-01-12 1:41 ` David Miller
2008-01-12 5:13 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-01-30 16:57 ` Kok, Auke
2008-01-11 16:20 ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-01-11 17:36 ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-01-11 18:45 ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 18:19 ` Breno Leitao
2008-01-11 18:48 ` Rick Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080110163626.GJ3544@solarflare.com \
--to=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=leitao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).