From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 001/001] ipv4: enable use of 240/4 address space
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 17:49:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20080111.174958.258783771.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20080108011057.GA21168@cisco.com>
	<p73bq7smx1t.fsf@bingen.suse.de>
	<20080111172915.GA6199@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: andi@firstfloor.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: vaf@cisco.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:44431
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756021AbYALBt7 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 20:49:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20080111172915.GA6199@cisco.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Vince Fuller <vaf@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 09:29:15 -0800

> I leave it up to you, the developers, to decide if you want to use these
> patches.

Vince, please just ignore these turkeys who are dismissing
your patch and respin it against current sources as I asked
of you.

I'll apply it, immediately, because it is the only correct
course of action.

Thanks a lot.