From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frans Pop Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 2.6.24-rc7: e1000: Detected Tx Unit Hang Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 08:51:55 +0100 Message-ID: <200801170851.56029.elendil@planet.nl> References: <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F52042FA541@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <36D9DB17C6DE9E40B059440DB8D95F520432DA91@orsmsx418.amr.corp.intel.com> <20080116.232037.261622584.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, slavon@bigtelecom.ru, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com ([213.75.38.118]:41713 "EHLO hpsmtp-eml18.kpnxchange.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751132AbYAQHv6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Jan 2008 02:51:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080116.232037.261622584.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thursday 17 January 2008, David Miller wrote: > From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" > > > We spent Wednesday trying to reproduce (without the patch) these issues > > without much luck, and have applied the patch cleanly and will continue > > testing it. Given the simplicity of the changes, and the community > > testing, I'll give my ack and we will continue testing. > > You need a slow CPU, and you need to make sure you do actually > trigger the TX limiting code there. Hmmm. Is a dual core Pentium D 3.20GHz considered slow these days?