From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Byron Bradley <byron.bbradley@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, hvr@gnu.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
Dale Farnsworth <dale@farnsworth.org>,
Manish Lachwani <mlachwani@mvista.com>,
Tzachi Perelstein <tzachi@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mv643xx: fix byte order when checksum offload is enabled
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 20:09:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080119200900.GE27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1200770858-11456-1-git-send-email-byron.bbradley@gmail.com>
On Sat, Jan 19, 2008 at 07:27:38PM +0000, Byron Bradley wrote:
> case IPPROTO_UDP:
> cmd_sts |= ETH_UDP_FRAME;
> - desc->l4i_chk = udp_hdr(skb)->check;
> + desc->l4i_chk = htons(udp_hdr(skb)->check);
> break;
> case IPPROTO_TCP:
> - desc->l4i_chk = tcp_hdr(skb)->check;
> + desc->l4i_chk = htons(tcp_hdr(skb)->check);
> break;
The first part was OK, but this one... AFAICS, the sucker byteswaps
64bit words in descriptors wholesale, right? Then the right way to spell
that would be ntohs((__force __be16)....->check).
What's happening here is that we take a fixed-endian (checksum) and then
correct for conversion done in hardware - i.e. we store it in something
that expects a _host_-endian value and would convert that to fixed-endian.
So we need to counter that correction and that's where the damn thing is
coming from.
It's not particulary rare - drivers that do hardware byteswap tend to need
it. For now I'd suggest explicit form (with force-cast from __csum to
__be16 and ntohs() on top of it); if anybody has good ideas for helper
names, though... csum_as_le() and csum_as_be(), perhaps? Interpret
__csum (fixed-endian) and another fixed-endian type, with proper checks;
i.e. something along the lines of
static inline __be16 csum_as_be(__csum sum)
{
return (__force __be16)sum;
}
and this stuff becoming ntohs(csum_as_be(udp_hdr(skb)->check)), etc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-19 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-19 19:27 [PATCH] mv643xx: fix byte order when checksum offload is enabled Byron Bradley
2008-01-19 20:09 ` Al Viro [this message]
2008-01-20 15:05 ` [PATCH] mv643xx_eth: " Byron Bradley
2008-01-19 20:23 ` Dale Farnsworth
2008-01-19 20:45 ` Dale Farnsworth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080119200900.GE27894@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=byron.bbradley@gmail.com \
--cc=dale@farnsworth.org \
--cc=hvr@gnu.org \
--cc=mlachwani@mvista.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzachi@marvell.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).