netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status?
@ 2008-01-04 19:21 Jeff Gustafson
  2008-01-20  4:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Gustafson @ 2008-01-04 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

Hi all,
	I have a question about the status of the spiffy updates to SFQ.  I
*really* like the ESFQ idea.  I appears to be exactly what I'm looking
for.  From what I can tell from this mailing list, SFQ is getting some
or all of the ESFQ features.  Although the ESFQ web site gives detailed
information about the status for inclusion in mainline, I am having
trouble finding out exactly what (if any) parts of ESFQ got into SFQ in
mainline.
	Did any of the ESFQ-like enhancements for SFQ reach .23 or do I still
need to patch?  I am running a stripped-down Fedora 8 box and it would
be very convenient if the patches were already in .23 or added by the
Fedora team.
	I tried to run the ESFQ command against SFQ, but the command was
rejected:

/sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10 hash
ctnatchg

	It appears the even if the kernel does have the patches, the shipped
version tc does not.

				..Jeff



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status?
  2008-01-04 19:21 ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status? Jeff Gustafson
@ 2008-01-20  4:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Hemminger @ 2008-01-20  4:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev

On Fri, 04 Jan 2008 11:21:15 -0800
Jeff Gustafson <ncjeffgus@zimage.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 	I have a question about the status of the spiffy updates to SFQ.  I
> *really* like the ESFQ idea.  I appears to be exactly what I'm looking
> for.  From what I can tell from this mailing list, SFQ is getting some
> or all of the ESFQ features.  Although the ESFQ web site gives detailed
> information about the status for inclusion in mainline, I am having
> trouble finding out exactly what (if any) parts of ESFQ got into SFQ in
> mainline.
> 	Did any of the ESFQ-like enhancements for SFQ reach .23 or do I still
> need to patch?  I am running a stripped-down Fedora 8 box and it would
> be very convenient if the patches were already in .23 or added by the
> Fedora team.
> 	I tried to run the ESFQ command against SFQ, but the command was
> rejected:
> 
> /sbin/tc qdisc add dev eth1 parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10 hash
> ctnatchg
> 
> 	It appears the even if the kernel does have the patches, the shipped
> version tc does not.
> 
> 				..Jeff

The mainline kernel doesn't have ESFQ, so the distribute version of iproute2
does not. If your distro chooses to add ESFQ to their kernel, then they
need to extend tc as well.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <stephen.hemminger@vyatta.com>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-01-20  4:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-01-04 19:21 ESFQ (or SFQ updates) mainline status? Jeff Gustafson
2008-01-20  4:50 ` Stephen Hemminger

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).