From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: kaber@trash.net
Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dsmark: get rid of trivial function
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 02:22:23 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080121.022223.85874858.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4793E460.5020804@trash.net>
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:16:32 +0100
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > Replace loop in dsmark_valid_indices with equivalent bit math.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
> >
> > --- a/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c 2008-01-20 13:07:58.000000000 -0800
> > +++ b/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c 2008-01-20 13:22:54.000000000 -0800
> > @@ -45,13 +45,8 @@ struct dsmark_qdisc_data {
> >
> > static inline int dsmark_valid_indices(u16 indices)
> > {
> > - while (indices != 1) {
> > - if (indices & 1)
> > - return 0;
> > - indices >>= 1;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return 1;
> > + /* Must have only one bit set */
> > + return (indices & (indices - 1)) == 0;
>
> hweight seems easier to understand, it took me a bit
> to realize that the comment matches the code :)
Sounds good. Here is what I ended up checking in.
[PKT_SCHED] dsmark: Use hweight32() instead of convoluted loop.
Based upon a patch by Stephen Hemminger and suggestions
from Patrick McHardy.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c b/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c
index a9732ae..d96eaf0 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_dsmark.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
#include <linux/errno.h>
#include <linux/skbuff.h>
#include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
+#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
#include <net/dsfield.h>
#include <net/inet_ecn.h>
@@ -43,17 +44,6 @@ struct dsmark_qdisc_data {
int set_tc_index;
};
-static inline int dsmark_valid_indices(u16 indices)
-{
- while (indices != 1) {
- if (indices & 1)
- return 0;
- indices >>= 1;
- }
-
- return 1;
-}
-
static inline int dsmark_valid_index(struct dsmark_qdisc_data *p, u16 index)
{
return (index <= p->indices && index > 0);
@@ -348,7 +338,8 @@ static int dsmark_init(struct Qdisc *sch, struct rtattr *opt)
goto errout;
indices = RTA_GET_U16(tb[TCA_DSMARK_INDICES-1]);
- if (!indices || !dsmark_valid_indices(indices))
+
+ if (hweight32(indices) != 1)
goto errout;
if (tb[TCA_DSMARK_DEFAULT_INDEX-1])
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-21 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20080120130542.16720b45@deepthought>
2008-01-20 21:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] dsmark: get rid of trivial function Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-21 0:16 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-01-21 8:39 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-21 10:22 ` David Miller [this message]
2008-01-22 3:47 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-01-22 3:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080121.022223.85874858.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).