From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3][NET] gen_estimator: list_empty() check in est_timer() fixed Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 07:42:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20080121064240.GB981@ff.dom.local> References: <20080120234959.GB2691@ami.dom.local> <20080120155544.0a071675@deepthought> <20080121063455.GA981@ff.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Badalian Vyacheslav , Patrick McHardy , jamal , David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Stephen Hemminger Return-path: Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.169]:29534 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752233AbYAUGgG (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 01:36:06 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id z38so835046ugc.16 for ; Sun, 20 Jan 2008 22:36:05 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080121063455.GA981@ff.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 21, 2008 at 07:34:55AM +0100, Jarek Poplawski wrote: ... > BTW, I've forgotten to mention with patch 1/3 that this checking with > warning on gen_new_estimator() double call should be only temporary, > and after more testing gen_estimator structure could be probably > decreased after removing bstats and rate_est fields. Hmm, let's forget about this again: it's too early in the morning... Jarek P.