From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-2.6 'upstream' 2008-01-22 Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:46:39 -0500 Message-ID: <20080123124639.GB3157@tuxdriver.com> References: <20080123014521.GG3206@tuxdriver.com> <20080123121551.4586e706@morte> <200801231230.07734.mb@bu3sch.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stefano Brivio , davem-fT/PcQaiUtIeIZ0/mPfg9Q@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-wireless-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Michael Buesch Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200801231230.07734.mb-fseUSCV1ubazQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-wireless-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jan 23, 2008 at 12:30:07PM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Wednesday 23 January 2008 12:15:51 Stefano Brivio wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:45:21 -0500 > > "John W. Linville" wrote: > > > > > b43legacy: Remove the PHY spinlock > > > > I hope you tested this. I still haven't been able to (I received the > > needed hardware yesterday), and Michael said that the patch has been > > compile-tested only. > > John, if we use subject lines such as: > > [PATCH RFT] foobar: bizbaz > > That means the patch is _not_ submitted for inclusion, yet. > The RFT means Request-For-Testing. Ususally, if I send out such Thanks, I'm well aware. Larry said he tested it, two weeks ago. No one contradicted it. And time is short for new development for 2.6.25 -- but there is plenty of time for fixes. :-) > For this particular patch, please leave it in now. I'm pretty > sure it is correct. So actual testing will be done upstream now. ;) Exactly. John -- John W. Linville linville-2XuSBdqkA4R54TAoqtyWWQ@public.gmane.org