From: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com>,
Denys Fedoryshchenko <denys@visp.net.lb>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 : net tcp_input.c warnings
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:41:26 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080124131126.GA698@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801241108400.31652@kivilampi-30.cs.helsinki.fi>
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:54:18AM +0200, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008, Dave Young wrote:
>
> Hi Dave (& others),
>
> > Thanks.
>
> Thanks a lot, I was first to ignore all these because they occurred
> with newreno, but looked again... :-/
>
> > New warning trigged with your debug patch:
>
> This was probably with the earlier one I sent to you because there's still
> this case remaining which itself is valid:
>
> > P: 5 L: 0 vs 0 S: 0 vs 1 w: 2044790889-2044796616 (0)
>
> ...snip... this is still ok state (S+L <= P):
>
> > P: 5 L: 0 vs 0 S: 0 vs 3 w: 2044790889-2044796616 (0)
> > TCP wq(s) <
> > TCP wq(h) +++h+<
> > l0 s3 f0 p5 seq: su2044790889 hs2044795029 sn2044796616
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c:2169 tcp_mark_head_lost+0x122/0x150()
> > Modules linked in: snd_seq_dummy snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi_event
> > snd_seq snd_seq_device snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss eeprom e100 psmouse
> > snd_hda_intel snd_pcm snd_timer btusb bluetooth serio_raw snd 3c59x sg
> > evdev thermal soundcore rtc_cmos snd_page_alloc rtc_core rtc_lib
> > i2c_i801 processor button intel_agp dcdbas pcspkr agpgart
> > Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 #8
> > [<c0132100>] ? have_callable_console+0x20/0x30
> > [<c0131844>] warn_on_slowpath+0x54/0x80
> > [<c03ffe54>] ? tcp_print_queue+0x1a4/0x230
> > [<c0132438>] ? vprintk+0x308/0x320
.
.
<snip>
.
.
> > ---[ end trace 14b601818e6903ac ]---
>
> ...But this no longer is, and even more, L: 5 is not valid state at this
> point all (should only happen if we went to RTO but it would reset S to
> zero with newreno):
>
> > P: 5 L: 5 vs 5 S: 0 vs 3 w: 2044790889-2044796616 (0)
> > TCP wq(s) LLLLl<
> > TCP wq(h) +++h+<
> > l5 s3 f0 p5 seq: su2044790889 hs2044795029 sn2044796616
>
> Surprisingly, it was the first time the WARN_ON for left_out returned
> correct location. This also explains why the patch I sent to Krishna
> didn't print anything (it didn't end up into printing because I forgot
> to add L+S>P check into to the state checking if).
>
> ...so please, could you (others than Denys) try this patch, it should
> solve the issue. And Denys, could you confirm (and if necessary double
> check) that the kernel you saw this similar problem with is the pure
> Linus' mainline, i.e., without any net-2.6.25 or mm bits please, if so,
> that problem persists. And anyway, there were some fackets_out related
> problems reported as well and this doesn't help for that but I think I've
> lost track of who was seeing it due to large number of reports :-), could
> somebody refresh my memory because I currently don't have time to dig it
> up from archives (at least on this week).
>
>
> --
> i.
>
> --
> [PATCH] [TCP]: NewReno must count every skb while marking losses
>
> NewReno should add cnt per skb (as with FACK) instead of depending
> on SACKED_ACKED bits which won't be set with it at all.
> Effectively, NewReno should always exists after the first
> iteration anyway (or immediately if there's already head in
> lost_out.
>
> This was fixed earlier in net-2.6.25 but got reverted among other
> stuff and I didn't notice that this is still necessary (actually
> wasn't even considering this case while trying to figure out the
> reports because I lived with different kind of code than it in
> reality was).
>
> This should solve the WARN_ONs in TCP code that as a result of
> this triggered multiple times in every place we check for this
> invariant.
>
> Special thanks to Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> and
> Krishna Kumar2 <krkumar2@in.ibm.com> for trying with my debug
> patches.
Hi,
Thanks, after applying the patch the warning is not seen.
Tested-by: Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> index 295490e..aa409a5 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
> @@ -2156,7 +2156,7 @@ static void tcp_mark_head_lost(struct sock *sk, int packets, int fast_rexmit)
> tp->lost_skb_hint = skb;
> tp->lost_cnt_hint = cnt;
>
> - if (tcp_is_fack(tp) ||
> + if (tcp_is_fack(tp) || tcp_is_reno(tp) ||
> (TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->sacked & TCPCB_SACKED_ACKED))
> cnt += tcp_skb_pcount(skb);
>
> --
> 1.5.2.2
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-24 13:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-01-21 7:55 2.6.24-rc8-mm1 : net tcp_input.c warnings Dave Young
2008-01-21 21:14 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-22 4:37 ` Dave Young
2008-01-22 9:09 ` Dave Young
2008-01-22 9:18 ` Dave Young
2008-01-22 10:47 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-23 1:44 ` Dave Young
2008-01-23 3:01 ` David Miller
2008-01-23 7:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-23 7:44 ` Dave Young
2008-01-23 8:41 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-23 11:01 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-24 2:42 ` Dave Young
2008-01-24 9:54 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-24 10:24 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2008-01-24 10:46 ` Krishna Kumar2
2008-01-24 13:11 ` Kamalesh Babulal [this message]
2008-01-25 1:30 ` Dave Young
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080124131126.GA698@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
--cc=hidave.darkstar@gmail.com \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi \
--cc=krkumar2@in.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).