From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH UCC TDM 1/3 Updated] Platform changes for UCC TDM driver for MPC8323eRDB. Also includes related QE changes and dts entries. Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 14:24:20 -0600 Message-ID: <20080124202420.GC3926@loki.buserror.net> References: <20080124154804.GA22178@localhost.localdomain> <4798B4F3.2010101@freescale.com> <20080124162345.GA27359@localhost.localdomain> <4798BDEB.2010501@freescale.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Poonam_Aggrwal-b10812 , michael.barkowski@freescale.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kumar.gala@freescale.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, rubini@vision.unipv.it, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, ashish.kalra@freescale.com, rich.cutler@freescale.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org To: Timur Tabi Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4798BDEB.2010501@freescale.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+glppd-linuxppc64-dev=m.gmane.org@ozlabs.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 10:33:47AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: Yes, but > deciding what the UCC does might not be static. At what point do we > declare, "UCC5 is for eth0 and eth0 only"? When the board designer decides to hook eth0 up to UCC5. If the board designer decides to hook multiple devices up to UCC5, we first smack the board designer, and then set it up to whichever configuration has been jumpered. -Scott