From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC, PATCH]: Pass link level header from/to PPP interface
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 14:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20080213.145355.57741113.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <ygfprv55egs.fsf@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
	<20080212.220603.111665989.davem@davemloft.net>
	<ygflk5opzhb.fsf@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: urs@isnogud.escape.de
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:38285
	"EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751357AbYBMWxX (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:53:23 -0500
In-Reply-To: <ygflk5opzhb.fsf@janus.isnogud.escape.de>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Urs Thuermann <urs@isnogud.escape.de>
Date: 13 Feb 2008 17:56:00 +0100

> Do you consider this strong enough to justify this change?

Can tcpdump and libpcap already handle PPP properly?