From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:14:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20080220.001450.132579707.davem@davemloft.net> References: <47BA87F0.1050709@cosmosbay.com> <1203491081.3248.60.camel@ymzhang> <47BBD8E9.2090700@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: dada1@cosmosbay.com Return-path: Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:56490 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752381AbYBTION (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:14:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47BBD8E9.2090700@cosmosbay.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:38:17 +0100 > Thanks very much Yanmin, I think we can apply your patch as is, if no > regression was found for 32bits. Great. Can I get a resubmission of the patch with a cleaned up changelog entry that describes in the regression along with the changelog bits I saw in the most recent version of the patch? An explicit "Acked-by:" from Eric would be nice too :-) Thanks!