From: Jim Westfall <jwestfall@surrealistic.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:95!
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:13:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080221191352.GV84358@surrealistic.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080220.215707.194209573.davem@davemloft.net>
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote [02.20.08]:
> From: Jim Westfall <jwestfall@surrealistic.net>
> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:46:48 -0800
>
> > static inline void llc_pdu_init_as_test_rsp(struct sk_buff *skb,
> > struct sk_buff *ev_skb)
> > {
> > struct llc_pdu_un *pdu = llc_pdu_un_hdr(skb);
> >
> > pdu->ctrl_1 = LLC_PDU_TYPE_U;
> > pdu->ctrl_1 |= LLC_1_PDU_CMD_TEST;
> > pdu->ctrl_1 |= LLC_U_PF_BIT_MASK;
> > if (ev_skb->protocol == htons(ETH_P_802_2)) {
> > struct llc_pdu_un *ev_pdu = llc_pdu_un_hdr(ev_skb);
> > int dsize;
> >
> > dsize = ntohs(eth_hdr(ev_skb)->h_proto) - 3;
> > memcpy(((u8 *)pdu) + 3, ((u8 *)ev_pdu) + 3, dsize);
> > skb_put(skb, dsize);
> > }
> > ..
> > }
>
> Probably what should happen is:
>
I just started looking at the skbuff|net|llc code last night, hopefully
these aren't totally stupid questions/comments.
> 1) First this function validates that there are really
> 'dsize' bytes available in the ev_skb source.
looks like this can be done easily with skb_tailroom()..
I am curious if we should also be verifying that dsize is valid? Its
value is coming from a recv'd llc packet.
The llc header is |mac|mac|16bit length|. The above code seems to be
piggy backing a normal ethernet header struct, by using h_proto as the
llc length. I am not sure if that length value can be trusted and we run
the risk of memcpy'ing off the end of the source structure/skbuff?
>
> 2) Second, skb_realloc_headroom() is called on 'skb' with
> a second argument of 'dsize'.
This suggestion escapes me. The skb_put() call in the above
code would increase skb->tail. Wont skb_realloc_headroom() create
additional space between skb->head and skb->data when we really want it
between skb->tail and skb->end?
thanks
jim
>
> That means also this function now needs to return error
> values, and the callers updated to handle that.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-21 19:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-20 0:20 kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c:95! Jim Westfall
2008-02-21 5:46 ` Jim Westfall
2008-02-21 5:57 ` David Miller
2008-02-21 19:13 ` Jim Westfall [this message]
2008-02-24 4:01 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080221191352.GV84358@surrealistic.net \
--to=jwestfall@surrealistic.net \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).