From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 - several bugs and a crash Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 09:09:08 -0800 Message-ID: <20080222170908.GA9386@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20080216002522.9c4bd0fb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47BC982C.7050402@imap.cc> <47BD6072.4000407@trash.net> <47BE1A03.30300@imap.cc> <47BE1CE5.1030001@imap.cc> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Patrick McHardy , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org To: Tilman Schmidt Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <47BE1CE5.1030001@imap.cc> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 01:52:53AM +0100, Tilman Schmidt wrote: > Am 22.02.2008 01:40 schrieb Tilman Schmidt: > >> > >> [NETFILTER]: nf_conntrack: fix smp_processor_id() in preemptible code warning > > > > Yes, it does; and the system also survives substantially longer. > > (IOW, it hasn't crashed on me so far.) > > Which of course it did the second after I sent off that mail. :-( > No message at all this time at the time of the crash, even though > I had "tail -f /var/log/messages" running in an ssh session. > > So the nf_conntrack BUG is fixed, but the crash (and of course the > swapper "spinlock bad magic" BUG) persists. Do you have CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT set? That would help find any other bugs similar to nf_conntrack. Thanx, Paul