netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Jann Traschewski <jann@gmx.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, 'Ralf Baechle' <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG][AX25] spinlock lockup
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2008 20:51:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080224195101.GA2961@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <001a01c87692$cfca8d00$453c822c@dg8ngn>

On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 04:10:29AM +0100, Jann Traschewski wrote:
> Hello,

Hi!

> I got a "spinlock lockup" using the latest Kernel 2.6.24.2 with recent
> patches from Jarek Poplawski applied.
...
>  ppp_deflate nf_nat zlib_deflateBUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
> dereference zlib_inflate nf_conntrack_ipv4 bsd_comp slhc ppp_async xt_state
...
> EIP is at skb_append+0x1b/0x30
...
> 00000010 BUG: spinlock lockup on CPU#1, bcm/12213, f40846b8

Looks like 2 in 1: NULL pointer dereference and (later?) lockup.

There is only one function in AX25 calling skb_append(), and it really
looks suspicious: appends skb after previously enqueued one, but in
the meantime this previous skb could be removed from the queue.

Here is a patch for testing: it fixes this simple way, so this is not
fully compatible with the current method, but let's check if this could
be a problem?

Regards,
Jarek P.

(testing patch #1)

---

 net/ax25/ax25_subr.c |   11 +++--------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
index d8f2157..034aa10 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_subr.c
@@ -64,20 +64,15 @@ void ax25_frames_acked(ax25_cb *ax25, unsigned short nr)
 
 void ax25_requeue_frames(ax25_cb *ax25)
 {
-	struct sk_buff *skb, *skb_prev = NULL;
+	struct sk_buff *skb;
 
 	/*
 	 * Requeue all the un-ack-ed frames on the output queue to be picked
 	 * up by ax25_kick called from the timer. This arrangement handles the
 	 * possibility of an empty output queue.
 	 */
-	while ((skb = skb_dequeue(&ax25->ack_queue)) != NULL) {
-		if (skb_prev == NULL)
-			skb_queue_head(&ax25->write_queue, skb);
-		else
-			skb_append(skb_prev, skb, &ax25->write_queue);
-		skb_prev = skb;
-	}
+	while ((skb = skb_dequeue_tail(&ax25->ack_queue)) != NULL)
+		skb_queue_head(&ax25->write_queue, skb);
 }
 
 /*

  reply	other threads:[~2008-02-24 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-24  3:10 [BUG][AX25] spinlock lockup Jann Traschewski
2008-02-24 19:51 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-02-25 11:42   ` Jann Traschewski
2008-05-26  8:23   ` [PATCH] Fix NULL pointer dereference and lockup Ralf Baechle
2008-05-26  8:42     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-06-03 21:54     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20080224195101.GA2961@ami.dom.local \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=jann@gmx.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).