From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [DCCP] [RFC]: Getting rid of unwieldy struct prefixes Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2008 10:02:10 -0300 Message-ID: <20080303130209.GA4196@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20080229094518.GA12858@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <20080229142334.GL4306@ghostprotocols.net> <20080303073454.GA6937@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Gerrit Renker , dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53663 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751537AbYCCNCP (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Mar 2008 08:02:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080303073454.GA6937@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Em Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 07:34:54AM +0000, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > | > [CCID-2]: Get rid of ccid2hc{tx,rx}_ prefixes > > | I haven't checked, is this over what is now on the test tree or on > | upstream? > | > The patch applies on top of the test tree (now online again), i.e. it > should apply when checking out a separate branch with the test tree in it. > > Are you basically ok with the naming scheme, do you have other > suggestions or are there additional considerations? Its ok, everywhere we use hctx or hcrx as the variable name, so its ok for plain old grep to find it. - Arnaldo