From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scott Wood Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] fs_enet: Be an of_platform device when CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING is set. Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2008 10:37:47 -0600 Message-ID: <20080307163747.GF10545@ld0162-tx32.am.freescale.net> References: <20070920220121.GF28784@loki.buserror.net> <200802151350.20627.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> <1203089936.20350.7.camel@p60365-ste> <200803071623.42519.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sergej Stepanov , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Laurent Pinchart Return-path: Received: from de01egw02.freescale.net ([192.88.165.103]:32812 "EHLO de01egw02.freescale.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752010AbYCGQiz (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Mar 2008 11:38:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200803071623.42519.laurentp@cse-semaphore.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 07, 2008 at 04:23:39PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Sergej, > > On Friday 15 February 2008 16:38, Sergej Stepanov wrote: > > Am Freitag, den 15.02.2008, 13:50 +0100 schrieb Laurent Pinchart: > > > We're loosing the possibility of having MDC and MDIO on different ports. > > > This is quite easy to fix for the non-CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING case but > > > I'm not familiar with OF bindings (yet) to fix the > > > CONFIG_PPC_CPM_NEW_BINDING case. > > > > for OF issue i had this for a paar month: > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg45778.html > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg47159.html > > i'll be glad if it helps... > > Could these be applied ? Any showstopper ? Acked-by: Scott Wood , if I haven't already. -Scott