From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: netconsole still hangs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:30:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312163013.aaf07aa0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080312161637.b082b515.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:16:37 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:14:29 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> >
> > I thought the recent reverts fixed this, but it seems that it's just become
> > a little harder to hit.
> >
> > I'm seeing netconsole hangs on two x86_64 systems (2-way t61p laptop, 8-way
> > server). Both use e1000.
> >
> > With current mainline on the 8-way, create a printk storm with
> >
> > while true
> > do
> > echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> > done
> >
> > and the machine goes tits-up after about five seconds.
> >
>
> whoops, hang on, it's still running.
And it's still running! I killed the above loop five minutes ago and
nothing new is coming out in `dmesg -c', yet data is still flying out over
netconsole. hundreds and hundreds of megabytes.
So I'd say that something in netconsole or the console susbsytem has
screwed up its buffer indices and it has gone infinite.
I don't know whether that's a regression though.
<does reboot -f>
OK, that stopped it, so the problem isn't buffering at the receiver. I
already knew that, because the ifconfig "TX bytes" counters were going up
on the sending side.
<runs the sysrq-trigger thing again>
OK, this time it did hang up. Machine unpingable, no signs of life.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 23:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 23:14 netconsole still hangs Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:30 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-03-12 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 6:10 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 6:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:12 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:48 ` Jike Song
2008-03-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-17 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 8:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 8:50 ` [Bug 10238] " Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 21:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 19:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-19 21:31 ` David Miller
2008-03-19 21:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 15:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-13 15:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080312163013.aaf07aa0.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).