From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: shemminger@linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl
Subject: Re: netconsole still hangs
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:57:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080312165717.c0879b1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080312163013.aaf07aa0.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:30:13 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:16:37 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:14:29 -0700
> > Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > I thought the recent reverts fixed this, but it seems that it's just become
> > > a little harder to hit.
> > >
> > > I'm seeing netconsole hangs on two x86_64 systems (2-way t61p laptop, 8-way
> > > server). Both use e1000.
> > >
> > > With current mainline on the 8-way, create a printk storm with
> > >
> > > while true
> > > do
> > > echo t > /proc/sysrq-trigger
> > > done
> > >
> > > and the machine goes tits-up after about five seconds.
> > >
> >
> > whoops, hang on, it's still running.
>
> And it's still running! I killed the above loop five minutes ago and
> nothing new is coming out in `dmesg -c', yet data is still flying out over
> netconsole. hundreds and hundreds of megabytes.
>
> So I'd say that something in netconsole or the console susbsytem has
> screwed up its buffer indices and it has gone infinite.
>
> I don't know whether that's a regression though.
>
> <does reboot -f>
>
> OK, that stopped it, so the problem isn't buffering at the receiver. I
> already knew that, because the ifconfig "TX bytes" counters were going up
> on the sending side.
>
> <runs the sysrq-trigger thing again>
>
> OK, this time it did hang up. Machine unpingable, no signs of life.
>
I reran the test on 2.6.24 and all seemed fine: the machine didn't hang and
stopping the script stopped the netconsole output.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-12 23:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 23:14 netconsole still hangs Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2008-03-13 6:10 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 6:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:12 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:48 ` Jike Song
2008-03-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-17 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 8:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 8:50 ` [Bug 10238] " Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 21:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 19:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-19 21:31 ` David Miller
2008-03-19 21:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 15:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-13 15:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080312165717.c0879b1d.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).