From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Josh Boyer Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: NEWEMAC: Support for Pause packets in EMAC driver Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2008 16:43:41 -0500 Message-ID: <20080317164341.12075616@zod.rchland.ibm.com> References: <1205488348-22536-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <47DE5F43.80604@garzik.org> <1205789101.26869.181.camel@pasglop> <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jeff Garzik , Stefan Roese , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Valentine Barshak To: benh@kernel.crashing.org Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:54133 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752686AbYCQVo3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:44:29 -0400 Received: from d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.227]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m2HLhKHR028317 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 17:43:20 -0400 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay02.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.7) with ESMTP id m2HLiSeq206194 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:44:28 -0600 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m2HLiQ0w004555 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:44:27 -0600 In-Reply-To: <1205789205.26869.184.camel@pasglop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 08:26:45 +1100 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 08:25 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pravin M. Bathija > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese > > > > --- > > > > drivers/net/ibm_newemac/core.c | 7 +++++++ > > > > 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > > > applied > > > > Thanks. There's also a couple of patches from Valentine that should go > > in. I'll ask him to resend to you. > > Actually, they need some arch bits so they are better off going through > Josh tree on top of the said changes. There's also the section mismatch patch I sent you. I don't care who's tree they go through, but I'd need to know either way so keep me in the loop please. josh