From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, shemminger@linux-foundation.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, rjw@sisk.pl,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 10238] Re: [PATCH] Re: netconsole still hangs
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 23:47:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20080318224729.GA2760@ami.dom.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080318144742.83f544f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 02:47:42PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 22:05:42 +0100
> Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com> wrote:
...
> > IMHO, after the below patch to sched.c you can't compare netconsole to
> > 2.6.24 with this sysrq-trigger test; any bugs found with this could be
...
> hm.
...
> So right now it's cannot-reproduce. I'll try things on the other machine
> this evening.
>
> I dunno why the sched.c change causes your sysrq-T operation to fail. Can
> you provide more details please?
...hmm...
Doesn't sysrq-t trigger this sched.c function?
Anyway... My first tests seemed to hang the box with syslog only. Now
I can't repeat it neither with syslog nor netconsole... So, this patch
is a bad hit or it's really about timing.
Jarek P.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-19 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-12 23:14 netconsole still hangs Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:16 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:30 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-12 23:57 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 6:10 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 6:52 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:12 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:25 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 7:48 ` Jike Song
2008-03-14 23:47 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-17 23:12 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 8:04 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 8:50 ` [Bug 10238] " Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 21:05 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-18 21:47 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-18 22:47 ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2008-03-19 19:17 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-19 21:20 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-19 21:31 ` David Miller
2008-03-19 21:54 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-03-20 23:08 ` David Miller
2008-03-13 7:59 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-13 15:09 ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-03-13 15:52 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20080318224729.GA2760@ami.dom.local \
--to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).